AnalPhilosopher

“[I]t is ambition enough to be employed as an under-labourer in clearing the ground a little,
and removing some of the rubbish that lies in the way to knowledge.” —John Locke, 1689

“[P]hilosophy can no more show a man what he should attach importance to
than geometry can show a man where he should stand.” —Peter Winch, 1968

A Flowchart on the Morality of War

Are moral considerations applicable to war?

No. This is positivistic political realism. "[M]orality has no application whatever to international relations" (page 56).

Yes. Should moral considerations be applied to war?

No. This is strong normative political realism. "[Moral] notions should [not] be appealed to in international relations" (57).

Yes. Should moral considerations be decisive?

No. This is weak normative political realism. "[M]oral considerations should [not] be decisive in the determination of [foreign] policy" (57).

Yes. This is idealism. "[S]tates ought always to act morally" (57). Is war ever morally justified?

No. I call this extreme pacifism.

Yes. Is war morally justified today, given the technology that exists?

No. I call this moderate pacifism. "[W]ar in the modern world is not morally justified" (14). Holmes is in this category.

Yes, provided certain requirements are satisfied. The just-war theory falls in this category. "[W]ar is sometimes morally permissible" (49).

This flowchart is based on Robert L. Holmes, On War and Morality (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989).

Account:
Password:
Remember info?