AnalPhilosopher

“[I]t is ambition enough to be employed as an under-labourer in clearing the ground a little,
and removing some of the rubbish that lies in the way to knowledge.” —John Locke, 1689

“[P]hilosophy can no more show a man what he should attach importance to
than geometry can show a man where he should stand.” —Peter Winch, 1968

From Today's New York Times

To the Editor:

In "Lethal Cruelty" (editorial, April 26), you maintain that "the death penalty is in all cases unconstitutional" and that the law of the land should recognize that the Eighth Amendment bars capital punishment.

I do not read any mention of the death penalty in this amendment. The actual text prohibits "cruel and unusual punishments." In some cases, death is a just punishment.

Throughout all of human history, the death penalty has been considered a grave but by no means excessive form of punishment, as long as it is reserved for the most extreme forms of crime.

I agree that lethal injections, if it can be proved that they result in excruciating pain before death, would qualify as torture and should therefore be barred by the Eighth Amendment.

Michel van der Hoek
Anoka, Minn., April 26, 2006

Mindy (mail):
I don't know, if someone's crime is so heinous it requires the death penalty, why should we care if the method of killing is painful or not?
4.30.2006 4:10pm
Peg (mail) (www):
We should care, Mindy, because there are basic human principles by which all of us should live. One of those is that we should not torture others nor cause them excrutiating pain - no matter what they have done.

If we take the posture: "This person has committed terrible acts, thus we are justified in doing the same to him" we diminish ourselves. Rarely, death is an appropriate punishment. "Cruel and unusual" punishment ought never be.

Very good letter from Mr. van der Hoek.
4.30.2006 6:50pm
Gary (mail):
As you tend a garden, sometimes it is necessary to pull the weeds.
4.30.2006 6:52pm
Kevin Stroup (mail):
There is finite money to spend on criminals, among other people. There are other people more deserving. Why not kill the more dangerous ones? A high velocity, large caliber rifle round to the head administers painkiller and death at the same time. No pain is felt. What is wrong with this method?
4.30.2006 10:17pm
Keith Burgess-Jackson (mail) (www):
I don't know why this is so hard. Murderers should die the same way their victims did: by poisoning, by bludgeoning, by shooting, by stabbing, by suffocation, &c.
4.30.2006 10:20pm
Frank Borger:
Okay, so what do we do to a man who wants to become a martyr?

Would denying him the opportunity to go immediately to heaven and be catered to by (I can never remember how many) virgins be "cruel and unusual" punishment according to his standards?
5.1.2006 1:55pm
Account:
Password:
Remember info?